HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 07:37
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 208
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 509
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1909) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 6.88
3% 5.77 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.09
5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 8.1 1 1 0.6 1.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 187
Write 102
Mixed 306
SusWrite 14
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 27.1
114% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 167
159% 246 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 123 125 125 117 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 78.4
Write 96.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 124
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
204% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback