Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 07:20
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 845
88% 709 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 33
Parallax 39.8
33% 37.7 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 37.6
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 856
Write 1,979
Mixed 601
259% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 51.5
228% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 1,043
728% 917 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 277%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
129GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 317 318 317 319 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 451
Mixed 447
SusWrite 337
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 56.9
190% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 188 181 177 190 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 146
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 181
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB
19GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 113 111 110 112 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 118
Write 84.6
Mixed 71
SusWrite 108
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
669GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 98.3
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 94.3
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 43.9
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.6
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $850
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback