Asus X450JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X450JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450JB
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 09 '17 at 03:25
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 538
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 1B6D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.34
3% 6.82 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.48
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 404
Mixed 417
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 43.9
169% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 118
142% 251 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
419GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 93.2
Mixed 82.1
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.17
63% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450JB Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback