MSI MS-16J6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J6  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 21:23
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 79.2
43% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 170
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
MSI(1462 1190) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 4.81
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.09
4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 275 279 280 235 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 372
Write 184
Mixed 208
SusWrite 267
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 22.1
88% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 216
175% 250 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate M3 2TB
38GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 49 42 37 47 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 46
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 41.1
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.2
87% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 63 72 68 62 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 95.4
Write 77.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 67.6
47% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 76%
SDXC Card 129GB
31GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 16 11 16 14 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 5.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 13.3
16% 14 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 9905663-007.A00G 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J6 Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback