TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory250.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 19:26
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 196
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 732
65% 551 Pts
64-Core 1,819
113% 1,819 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 70.4%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295
Nvidia(10DE 062E) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.96
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.66%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg50pnv2t04 TOSHIBA 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AFGA4104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1152 998 1001 1000 1003 1001 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,200
Write 1,185
Mixed 1,025
SusWrite 1026
250% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 35.3
137% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 772
615% 861 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑
This bench: 192%
 Great: 236%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 32GB
29GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.6 4.7 4.6 4 3.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 4.1
10% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
180% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 12.6%
 Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 46
134% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 143%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples17x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples26x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples18x
SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD  $77Bench 277%, 114,373 samples11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples9x
RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback