To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 679
61% 514 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 118
Parallax 97.7
84% 106 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 104
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 1328 1867 1614 1520 1528 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,003
Write 1,814
Mixed 1,625
SusWrite 1,411
385% 1,713 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 53
168% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 559
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 500
368% 486 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 240%
Great: 410%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
29GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.9 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3
9% 10 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 23.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback