TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 233
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 452
60% 449 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395
Apple(106B 014C) 2GB
CLim: 834 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 42.3
30% 39.3 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 28.5
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 28.8%
 Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 371 365 377 377 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 443
Write 369
Mixed 327
SusWrite 377
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 23.4
113% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 251
206% 295 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 88.4%
 Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 0x802C 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 65.7%
 Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples51x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples26x
Core i5-6600Intel  $133Bench 68%, 80,688 samples9x
GPU
Radeon R9 M380AMDBench 18%, 336 samples34x
RADEON R9 M390AMDBench 22%, 314 samples22x
RADEON R9 M395XAMDBench 32%, 227 samples16x
SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples4x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples4x
SM1024G PCIe 1TBAppleBench 169%, 404 samples3x
RAM
0x484D54343531533642465238412D52442020 2x4GBUnknownBench 62%, 189 samples9x
0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GBUnknownBench 62%, 190 samples6x
0x 4x8GBUnknownBench 69%, 42 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback