Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 15:30
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 771
72% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,432
89% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 549 399 400 403 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,500
Write 1,050
Mixed 950
SusWrite 541
225% 1,010 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.5
204% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1006
DQ Write 1,244
DQ Mixed 1,132
852% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 206%
Great: 302%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SV300S3 240GB
115GB free
Firmware: 600A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 140 149 124 143 136 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 272
Write 163
Mixed 171
SusWrite 140
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 10.5
37% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 48.9
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 57.4
52% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 61%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EZEX-00W 1TB
503GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 109 105 110 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 103
Write 107
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 108
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 18.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback