Sony SVE1713V1EB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony SVE1713V1EB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 21:47
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 155
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 200
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1003
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 4.44
5% 5.49 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.35
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 45 46 38 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 46.1
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 41.5
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0
15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVE1713V1EB Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Sony SVE1713V1EB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback