HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 21:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 539
59% 465 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 26.8
30% 32.5 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 32
30% 37 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 319 356 276 235 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 639
Write 234
Mixed 271
SusWrite 277
78% 355 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 34.9
116% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 386
301% 425 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 147%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
734GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 187 190 189 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 182
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 187
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback