Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 139 2-Core 271 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 950 89% 740 Pts	64-Core 1,291 80% 1,291 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile) 4,380 User benchmarks, average bench 112% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 158 Parallax 146 118% 150 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 133 Splatting 109 112% 142 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 624GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1609 1589 1580 1625 1491 1339 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 1,001 Write 1,725 Mixed 986 SusWrite 1,539 298% 1,312 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 76.6 251% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,054 DQ Write 899 DQ Mixed 988 737% 980 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 348GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 1715 1248 1396 1343 1247 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 1,293 Write 1,773 Mixed 895 SusWrite 1,452 306% 1,353 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 75.2 243% 82.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,103 DQ Write 933 DQ Mixed 1,031 769% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 744GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 436 438 437 437 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 371 Mixed 354 SusWrite 433 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 39.2 128% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 253 206% 294 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GB 3,055 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 26.4 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 33.9 SC Mixed 27.4 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	447x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	411x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	318x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	258x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	207x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	97x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	378x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	120x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	113x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16