HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 18:50
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 705
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 136
Parallax 116
100% 125 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 123
Splatting 106
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 319 313 317 299 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 295
Write 286
Mixed 299
SusWrite 313
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 40.6
131% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 99.9
DQ Mixed 53.4
45% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST3250824AS P 250GB
212GB free
Firmware: 3.BQH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 61
Write 48.9
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 50.3
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 37.7
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback