Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 125
59% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 332
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 5.91
3% 5.17 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.48
5% 5.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 3%
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 83
54% 68.6 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 73
52% 61.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 354
Write 132
Mixed 192
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 31
115% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 114
99% 153 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
87GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 111 112 110 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 191
Write 149
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 111
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 1315 BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 1315 CT51264BD160B.C16F 1315 BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback