Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 14:34
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 212
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 650
62% 515 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 113
Parallax 93.3
82% 102 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 98.7
79% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 818 816 818 817 798 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,260
Write 1,949
Mixed 1,530
SusWrite 852
368% 1,648 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 80
256% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 818
593% 775 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 256%
Great: 346%
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75
30GB free
Firmware: RG20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 121 99 183 181 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 380
Write 195
Mixed 214
SusWrite 150
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 36
139% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 104
99% 156 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
45GB free
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 183 179 173 170 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 446
Write 241
Mixed 199
SusWrite 182
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 32.2
129% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 92.9
108% 188 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 290 289 290 289 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 441
Mixed 360
SusWrite 307
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 49.4
172% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 264
210% 297 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
432GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 70.6
Write 63.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 84.4
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
128GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 115 115 111 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 79
SusWrite 112
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB
17GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 33.9
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 38.5
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 44
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 123%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback