Dell Latitude E6330

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6330  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0F7WM9
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140924
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 14:28
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 86.1
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 117
59% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 199
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0533) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.59 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.61
5% 5.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 FDE 2.5" 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM77D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 98 76 83 75 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 49
Write 93
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 80.1
17% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.1
15% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64C88B1NS-DI 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6330 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback