Asus M11BB

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus M11BB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M11BB
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131224
Uptime	21 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '17 at 02:50
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130 12,547 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 124 56% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 203 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D 5,822 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8526) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 6.19 Parallax 7.19 4% 5.89 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 5.26 4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19881 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1546 (B1) Unknown 97 97 83 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 38 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 218 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33455684584	65.4% Good	Read 266 Write 249 Mixed 261 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 25 107% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 63.7 74% 128 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 118%
Hitachi HDN 724040ALE640 4TB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 370GB free Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 80 (03) Spinup time 172 172 51569623481 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 806 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13808 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 801 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1269 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1269 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 188979740712 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	51.3% Above average	Read 98.6 Write 80.2 Mixed 75.9 64% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.23 77% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDN 724040ALE640 4TB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 298GB free Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 80 (03) Spinup time 155 155 51580567924 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 834 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14361 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 824 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1293 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1293 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 197569609768 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	82.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 137 Mixed 122 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.24 63% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 90%
WD My Passport 259B 3TB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID 259b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 79.9 Write 77.4 Mixed 69.5 96% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.21 64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.7% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 7 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M11BB Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M11BB

CPU
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	139x
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples	49x
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	65x
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	19x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	51x
SLZ302G08-GGNNG 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 189 samples	10x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16