Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 22 months ago.

System	Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1756 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181025
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$126 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 82.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 623 71% 553 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.9% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 59.6 Parallax 53.7 46% 56.7 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 59.2 Splatting 62.8 51% 62.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: P180831a SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 87 90 83 87 113 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 414 Write 124 Mixed 171 SusWrite 93.2 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 21.7 108% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 92.8 77% 110 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 88%
Verbatim Desktop HDD 3.0 4TB 209 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3.5TB free, PID 0415 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 53 40 45 43 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 63.5 Write 54.2 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 43.3 72% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GB 8,909 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.3% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 10.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,336x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	686x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	357x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1,311x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	535x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	326x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	999x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	209x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	185x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	236x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples	177x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	177x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $331

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16