Gigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H270N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1292 x 730 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '17 at 21:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 179
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 297
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 37.9
33% 36.8 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,487
Write 999
Mixed 1,204
342% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 41.4
245% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 273
263% 434 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 255%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
214GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 74.2
Write 74.1
Mixed 70.1
55% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.39
90% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback