Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 12:54
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 698 70% 568 Pts	64-Core 957 59% 957 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.24% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.94 4% 4.83 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 6.22 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.24% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 202 197 210 218 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 1,860 Write 435 Mixed 425 SusWrite 266 162% 747 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 13.3 83% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 419 DQ Write 28 DQ Mixed 185 144% 211 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 236%
Sandisk S064G 63GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 54GB free Firmware: 3.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 169 175 174 179 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 444 Write 191 Mixed 153 SusWrite 176 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 13.2 55% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 19.8 16% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 47%
Intel 330 Series 240GB 1,960 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 222GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 131 130 131 133 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 445 Write 116 Mixed 171 SusWrite 131 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 20.2 77% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 56.7 DQ Mixed 75.1 64% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 91%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 905GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 128 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 130 Write 133 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 130 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 32 37 35 30 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Kingston 9905678-138.A00G CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 28 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 27.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	328x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)