Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 10:49
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 959
85% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,888
117% 1,888 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 175 174 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 472
Write 170
Mixed 178
SusWrite 175
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 12.9
85% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 34.5
58% 113 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
881GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 187 188 188 185 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 179
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 186
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 176 176 177 176 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 177
Write 181
Mixed 121
SusWrite 173
220% 163 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 98%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 10TB
7TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 38
Mixed 33
SusWrite 38.8
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
204% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 110
122% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 33
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 32.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,034
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback