Acer Aspire E5-523G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-523G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Wasp_SR
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 07:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 52
2-Core 78.8
42% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 79.4
10% 78.9 Pts
64-Core 79.2
5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Acer(1025 1099) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 6.19
Parallax 4
2% 4.4 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 200 193 234 216 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 298
Write 118
Mixed 164
SusWrite 210
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 15.1
55% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 44.7
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 40.4
32% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-523G Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-523G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback