Asus M2N68 Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M2N68 Plus  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100610
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '17 at 14:44
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9500
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Memory 6.3
1-Core 31.3
2-Core 63.4
16% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 114
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 44
33% 39.5 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 49
Splatting 36.1
37% 46.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 228
Write 114
Mixed 125
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 11.1
58% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 10.2
16% 30 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 35%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 440
9% 440 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68 Plus Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback