MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200418
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 16:46
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 950
94% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 101
Parallax 154
96% 124 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 113
Splatting 141
99% 118 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 858 867 863 864 860 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2713
Write 2,415
Mixed 1888
SusWrite 888
442% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 89.7
290% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 536
483% 754 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 292%
Great: 355%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB
562GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 90 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 87.7
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 84%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
914GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 343 346 345 346 346 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 315
Write 332
Mixed 177
SusWrite 342
214% 292 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 1.8
505% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 189%
Great: 201%
Amd-raid WDC WD30EZRZ-00Z 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 123 123 124 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 123
Mixed 52
SusWrite 121
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
296GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 95.7
Write 97.8
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 53.4
100% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 61%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
3TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 103
Write 89.3
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 90.8
117% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 36.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 35.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback