To Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 14:58
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 70 2-Core 127 57% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 480 43% 362 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	7.7% Terrible	Lighting 9.07 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 7.44 7% 9.04 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 9.91 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 122 129 122 130 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 146 Write 116 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 125 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 108%
Perfect DataMan 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 35GB free, PID 0918 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 14 21 24 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.1% Poor	Read 93.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 3.8 SusWrite 20.6 27% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 34.8 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	505x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	215x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	95x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	103x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	42x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16