Huawei KPL-W0X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHuawei KPL-W0X  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI KPL-W0X-PCB
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 09:24
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 39
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 142
44% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 207
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Device(19E5 3E06) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 7.06
5% 7.11 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 6.83
5% 5.71 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E256 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C286402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 158 185 241 212 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 443
Write 260
Mixed 240
SusWrite 202
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 21.6
75% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 104
84% 119 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTA4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KPL-W0X Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei KPL-W0X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback