Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 04:47
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 843
82% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 50.7
44% 55.8 fps
MRender 77.2
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 70.7
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 93 78 73 38 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 470
Write 316
Mixed 342
SusWrite 87.3
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 33.8
139% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 186
161% 236 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78%
Great: 87%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
497GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 474 482 485 485 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 483
Mixed 407
SusWrite 478
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 46.5
162% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
750GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 178 181 179 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 117
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 179
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
201GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 95.5
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
663GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 167 172 169 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 119
Write 145
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 169
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake R009D408GX2-3600C18B 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 32.3
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $854
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback