Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 09KPNV
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 146 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 467 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Lighting 60.4 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 85.9 49% 73.7 fps	MRender 76 Gravity 59 Splatting 63.4 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110 3,009 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1311 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 218 223 221 219 221 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.6% Above average	Read 228 Write 220 Mixed 147 SusWrite 219 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 27 95% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 85.1 DQ Mixed 35 33% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 109%
MB0500EBNCR 500GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 56GB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 97 96 99 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 70.3 Write 72.7 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 97.3 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 78%
Toshiba StorE HDD 320GB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 208GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.17% Terrible	Read 25.9 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 0.4 6% 7.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 4.17% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 124GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.23% Terrible	Read 31.1 Write 28.4 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 12.4 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.23% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 510 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 0GB free, PID a00a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32.6 Write 28.7 Mixed 21.1 34% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 46%
Generic External 500GB 1,039 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 261GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 26.8 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 12.5 30% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 21%
ST9500325AS 500GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 10GB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 33.4 Write 28.4 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 12.4 31% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.1 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

CPU
Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples	481x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	330x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	243x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	173x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	157x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	128x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	145x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	75x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	55x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	652x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	578x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	325x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16