Lenovo 20254

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20254  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G405s
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 01:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5550M APU-$80
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 65.5
35% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 110
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.8000
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 2.16
2% 2.81 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 3.91
2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 90 89 87 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 87.4
Write 97.7
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 84.9
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170ME68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20254 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20254

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback