Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 20:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 586
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 35.7
24% 30.7 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 26
Splatting 31.7
23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256F 251GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM8JA1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 938
Write 653
Mixed 438
149% 676 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 483
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 231
206% 317 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 99%
WD My Book 1112 999GB
650GB free, PID 1112
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 34
Write 36
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 37.2
47% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343147553742465238432D52442020 0x802C 0x31384A534631473732415A2D314739453220 0x80AD 0x484D54343147553741465238432D52442020 0x802C 0x31384A534631473732415A2D314739453220 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 40
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback