Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141110
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 151
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 610
58% 477 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 107
Parallax 91.3
84% 100 fps
MRender 84.9
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 85.9
70% 85.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 666
Write 942
Mixed 508
158% 705 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 40.3
166% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 656
489% 651 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 230%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
295GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 424 437 427 434 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 383
Write 411
Mixed 301
SusWrite 423
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 28.3
106% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 160
143% 208 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
1.5TB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 435 448 438 446 450 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 421
Mixed 372
SusWrite 433
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 43.5
140% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 347
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 130%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
40GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 67 6.4 6.3 6.3 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 442
Write 402
Mixed 377
SusWrite 77.5
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 20.8
103% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 35.7
85% 172 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 39.7
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback