Compal QAL51

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Compal QAL51 (all builds)
Motherboard	Compal Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120605
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 19:15
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 434 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Compal(14C0 0066) 2GB CLim: 835 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.77% Terrible	Lighting 7.63 Reflection 6.42 Parallax 7.16 6% 7.07 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 9.57 Splatting 10.2 8% 9.45 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.77% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 153 136 134 135 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 449 Write 348 Mixed 320 SusWrite 181 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 26.9 99% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 210 180% 262 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 95%
USB Flash Memory 2GB 592 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Read 12 Write 5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.3 8% 6.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 7%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 67GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 16 15 15 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 18.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 15.7 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.5 164% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.7 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QAL51 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Compal QAL51

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	13x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	8x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	15x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	12x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 165 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	3x
99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 4,502 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16