TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Novatech PC-1761D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemNovatech PC-1761D  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z87-HD3
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140120
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 584
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 3061) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 30.6
20% 26 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 24.4
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 20.8%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 36 40 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 172
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 177
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 97.2%
 Great: 100%
WD WD10EZEX-00BN5A0 (TurboPC EX) 1TB
773GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 161
Write 21.1
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 44.2
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 58.9%
 Great: 102%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
305GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 40
Write 29
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 40.4
46% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 22.1%
 Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 57.1%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback