Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 16:00
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 428
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 95.8
Parallax 94.7
82% 97.2 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 79.2
74% 92.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
115GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 671 623 597 600 599 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 652
Write 669
Mixed 669
SusWrite 626
148% 654 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 59.3
210% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 1,200
783% 912 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 163%
Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 260 230 211 186 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 490
Mixed 419
SusWrite 225
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 53.8
193% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 144
115% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
68GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 99 117 148 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 118
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 109%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
154GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 124
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 114
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
43GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 91 98 101 131 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 29
SusWrite 108
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
47GB free, PID a102
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 77
Mixed 31
SusWrite 72.9
85% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 20.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback