Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A6-9500B R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G 154 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 60 1-Core 57 2-Core 83.2 42% 66.7 Pts	4-Core 85.8 8-Core 85.7 12% 85.8 Pts	64-Core 83.8 5% 83.8 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5118) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 5.56 3% 5.37 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 6.74 4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 65 52 46 44 67 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 77.6 Write 91.9 Mixed 158 SusWrite 57.3 22% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 12.9 52% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 0.1 28% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1200, 1200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
PRO A6-9500B R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4GAMDBench 33%, 154 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	8x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
SD7TB6S256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 77%, 1,033 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5143SB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 35%, 2,061 samples	1x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 31%, 10,211 samples	1x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35