Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 14:16
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 97
2-Core 185
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 437
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 6900) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 443.36
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 54.2
53% 60.4 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 64.1
53% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 262 248 249 263 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 323
Write 324
Mixed 249
SusWrite 245
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 30.7
111% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 173
143% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72%
Great: 126%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 55 63 56 47 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 65.6
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 55.9
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 32%
Great: 86%
Intenso SCSI 1TB
918GB free
Firmware: 0209
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 116
Mixed 79.3
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.6
288% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.8% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $208
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback