HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-05xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-05xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 12:40
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 260
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 816
81% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 150
Parallax 141
111% 142 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 133
Splatting 110
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 37 51 48 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 723
Write 39.4
Mixed 107
SusWrite 42
48% 228 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 4.6
54% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 147%
Intenso SATAIII 512GB
373GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 184 113 112 77 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 475
Write 243
Mixed 295
SusWrite 131
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 13.7
60% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 20.4
37% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
686GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 179 178 179 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 174
Mixed 110
SusWrite 179
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 109%
1TB USB3 StreamStore 24 1TB
502GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 95.5
122% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C19-8GIS 04CD F4-2666C19-8GIS Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8 Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 27.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-05xx Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-05xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback