TIMI Mi NoteBook Horizon Edition 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemTIMI Mi NoteBook Horizon Edition 14  (all builds)
MotherboardTIMI TM1941
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 15:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 356
57% 408 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D72 1941) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 6
4% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 11
7% 8.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGXA4103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 751 677 814 813 813 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 575
Write 1,132
Mixed 534
SusWrite 759
170% 750 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 67.6
228% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 513
383% 522 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 164%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 25.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mi NoteBook Horizon Edition 14 Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: TIMI Mi NoteBook Horizon Edition 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback