Asrock Z170M Pro4S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z170M Pro4S  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 191
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 377
51% 378 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 42.2
33% 38.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 45 46 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 399
Write 45
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 44.5
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
298GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 109 109 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 64
SusWrite 107
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 112%
WD WD5000AAKX-003CA 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 74.5
Write 80
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 80.1
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M Pro4S Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Pro4S - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback