Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo L9300 128 User benchmarks, average bench 33% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 39.8 30% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 40.1 8-Core 41.6 5% 40.8 Pts	64-Core 39.3 2% 39.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(10F7 8338) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 886GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 119 116 119 114 120 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 127 Write 120 Mixed 121 SusWrite 116 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 22.4 72% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 99.4 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 87.2 67% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 133%
Generic SC128 SD Card 128GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 119GB free Firmware: 8.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	8.83% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 12.2 Mixed 14 SusWrite 13.2 10% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.5 689% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.83% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 44GB 6,316 User benchmarks, average bench 23% null MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16