Asrock X99 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS  (all builds)
Memory91.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '17 at 18:29
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 769
68% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,266
78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 189
Parallax 183
129% 177 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 174
Splatting 125
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
931GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 512
Write 406
Mixed 425
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 15.1
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 13.1
14% 23 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 1,853
Mixed 1,867
452% 2,033 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 36.8
113% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 13.3
99% 230 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 259%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 96GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 43.2
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback