Zotac XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZotac XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC XXXXXX
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '17 at 15:19
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3150
¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 39.5
26% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 69.5
8-Core 73.7
10% 71.6 Pts
64-Core 79
5% 79 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Zotac(19DA B301) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 2.59
2% 2.59 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.65
3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 493
Write 378
Mixed 404
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 14.4
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 47
DQ Mixed 14.4
18% 30 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XXXXXX Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zotac XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback