Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110222
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 07:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 145
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 470
44% 367 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 39.8
28% 35.9 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 44
Splatting 28.4
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 121 118 145 140 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 371
Write 216
Mixed 170
SusWrite 124
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 23.6
89% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 72.2
110% 213 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
297GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 73 73 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 70.5
Write 69.4
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 70.7
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67A-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback