HP Pro 3330 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pro 3330 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 17A0
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130705
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 195
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 372
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 20.3
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 20.6
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qnix 128GB 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 219 141 99 94 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 254
Write 218
Mixed 215
SusWrite 128
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 17
84% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 83.1
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 26.5
50% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
69GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 92.9
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 95.4
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3330 MT Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3330 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $279WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback