Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 05:27
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 668
73% 580 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5198
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 77
76% 87.3 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 77.2
69% 86 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,408
Write 1,401
Mixed 1,334
309% 1,381 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.1
184% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 777
594% 804 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 191%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
260GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 103 104 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 124
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 101
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8ME-16 Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 28.7
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.8
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback