Samsung 535U4C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 535U4C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP535U4C-S02CA
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 61.2
38% 55.6 Pts
4-Core 91.3
8-Core 97.4
12% 94.4 Pts
64-Core 97.7
6% 97.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7500M/7600M Dual Graphics
Sanyo(144D C660) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.81
4% 4.39 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 5.61
4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
648GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 85 91 87 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 92
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 88.2
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5273EB0-CH9 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 535U4C Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 535U4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback