Acer Aspire 9920

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire 9920 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire 9920
Memory	2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20080107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$160 996 User benchmarks, average bench 39% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	40% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 36.9 2-Core 70.3 40% 59.3 Pts	4-Core 56.4 8-Core 70 8% 63.2 Pts	64-Core 70.9 4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT 3,959 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0142) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 0.78 2% 2.54 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.15 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 84 83 82 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 125 Write 101 Mixed 118 SusWrite 84.2 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 15.3 47% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 86.3 DQ Write 63.1 DQ Mixed 74.4 56% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 33GB free Firmware: FB2OC40C SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 63 63 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 56.1 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 61.9 38% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire 9920 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 9920

CPU
Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T9500Intel $160Bench 39%, 996 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 8600M GTNvidiaBench 1%, 2,041 samples	5x
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
M4 64GBCrucial $92Bench 55%, 7,336 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $126

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16