TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G3-710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAcer Predator G3-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-710(KBL)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 15:53
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 238
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 682
68% 556 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 85.2%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2950 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 177
Reflection 199
217% 188 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 262 262 241 260 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 429
Write 261
Mixed 218
SusWrite 254
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 26.6
131% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 190
176% 274 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 85.6%
 Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
303GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 135 134 135 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 110
Write 136
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 132
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 69.7%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 22.7
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 78%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator G3-710 Builds (Compare 2,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator G3-710

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples1,005x
Core i5-6400Intel  $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples739x
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples693x
GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples764x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples378x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples313x
SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel  $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples296x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples121x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples106x
RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples173x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples168x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples120x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback