Gigabyte GA-MA74GM-S2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA74GM-S2  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100831
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 15:10
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 98.9
50% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 186
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3554) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 23
11% 17.7 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.9
17% 21 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,747
Write 13.5
Mixed 30.7
428% 597 MB/s
4K Read 276
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
11,717% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
129GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 548
Write 2.2
Mixed 19.5
136% 190 MB/s
4K Read 226
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 9.7
10,588% 80 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
306GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,140
Write 11.5
Mixed 27.2
282% 393 MB/s
4K Read 288
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.7
12,200% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.4
Write 8.8
Mixed 6.2
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Sandisk USB Ultra 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 12.3
Write 1
Mixed 4.7
6% 6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA74GM-S2 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA74GM-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback