MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 12:52
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 868
72% 623 Pts
64-Core 1283
79% 1283 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 58.3
16% 33.3 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 31.5
26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 324
Mixed 336
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 34.1
138% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 179
163% 246 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
6GB free
Firmware: KC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 66
72% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
WD Green 750GB (2012)
44GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 62
Write 41.6
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 61.9
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
200GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 75
Mixed 43.4
45% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 9
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA8A-26N1900 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback