QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 22:41
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 56.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 224
71% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 608
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.3% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 100
Parallax 104
86% 103 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 86.3
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 129GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,074
Write 918
Mixed 700
199% 897 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 28.2
90% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 76.9
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 73.1
56% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Covecube Virtual Disk 281.5TB
262TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,193
Write 2916
Mixed 2,874
668% 2,994 MB/s
4K Read 91.1
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 98.8
311% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 239
177% 233 MB/s
Seagate Expansion 320GB
123GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 81
Write 70.6
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 70.8
90% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback